Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spiritual Death"

From MormonWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so in January 2009 I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially to a new-comer like me, so I haven't done it yet. Does anyone have any preferences one way or the other? Should I go ahead and completely revise the old sections of the article?
+
I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so in January 2009 I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially for a new-comer like me, so I haven't done it yet. Does anyone have any preferences one way or the other? Should I go ahead and completely revise the old sections of the article?

Revision as of 18:24, 29 April 2009

I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so in January 2009 I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially for a new-comer like me, so I haven't done it yet. Does anyone have any preferences one way or the other? Should I go ahead and completely revise the old sections of the article?