Difference between revisions of "Adam-God Theory"

From MormonWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added definition, possible explanation, and refutation by President Kimball.)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Adam-God theory is based upon comments, never fully explained, by Brigham Young, the second prophet and President of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]].
+
The Adam-God theory suggests that Adam, who foremost fell that man might be, may be the same being as God the Father, the father of our spirits and the physical father of Jesus Christ. This idea has been construed from comments, never fully explained, by President Brigham Young, the second prophet and President of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]].
  
In 1897, Wilford Woodruff, then President of the Church, wrote a private letter concerning Young's teachings on Adam, stating:
+
It is useful to note that "Adam" is a title, which means "first man." God explained to Moses, "And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many" (Moses 1:34). God the Father is also a Man, for "in the language of Adam, Man of Holiness is his name, and the name of his Only Begotten is the Son of Man" (Moses 6:57). Since God the Father is the progenitor of Adam and Eve, the title of "first man" or "Adam" might equally apply to Him. This is one possible explanation of President Young's comments on the matter.
  
The doctrine was never submitted to the councils of the Priesthood nor to the church for approval or ratification, and was never formally or otherwise accepted by the church. It is therefore in no sense binding upon the Church. Brigham Young's ‘bare mention’ was ‘without indubitable evidence and authority being given of its truth.Only the scripture, the ‘accepted word of God,is the Church's standard (Letter to A. Saxey, January 7, 1897, HDC).
+
In 1897, Wilford Woodruff, then President of the Church, wrote a private letter concerning the Adam-God theory, stating:
 +
 
 +
The doctrine was never submitted to the councils of the Priesthood nor to the church for approval or ratification, and was never formally or otherwise accepted by the church. It is therefore in no sense binding upon the Church. Brigham Young's "bare mention" was "without indubitable evidence and authority being given of its truth." Only the scripture, the "accepted word of God," is the Church's standard (Letter to A. Saxey, January 7, 1897, HDC).
 +
 
 +
President Spencer W. Kimball flatly denounced the idea as false in the October 1976 General Conference as follows:
 +
 
 +
"We hope that you who teach in the various organizations, whether on the campuses or in our chapels, will always teach the orthodox truth. We warn you against the dissemination of doctrines which are not according to the scriptures and which are alleged to have been taught by some of the General Authorities of past generations. Such, for instance, is the Adam-God theory. We denounce that theory and hope that everyone will be cautioned against this and other kinds of false doctrine." (Spencer W. Kimball, "Our Own Liahona," Ensign, November 1976, p. 77.)

Revision as of 21:35, 6 April 2007

The Adam-God theory suggests that Adam, who foremost fell that man might be, may be the same being as God the Father, the father of our spirits and the physical father of Jesus Christ. This idea has been construed from comments, never fully explained, by President Brigham Young, the second prophet and President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

It is useful to note that "Adam" is a title, which means "first man." God explained to Moses, "And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many" (Moses 1:34). God the Father is also a Man, for "in the language of Adam, Man of Holiness is his name, and the name of his Only Begotten is the Son of Man" (Moses 6:57). Since God the Father is the progenitor of Adam and Eve, the title of "first man" or "Adam" might equally apply to Him. This is one possible explanation of President Young's comments on the matter.

In 1897, Wilford Woodruff, then President of the Church, wrote a private letter concerning the Adam-God theory, stating:

The doctrine was never submitted to the councils of the Priesthood nor to the church for approval or ratification, and was never formally or otherwise accepted by the church. It is therefore in no sense binding upon the Church. Brigham Young's "bare mention" was "without indubitable evidence and authority being given of its truth." Only the scripture, the "accepted word of God," is the Church's standard (Letter to A. Saxey, January 7, 1897, HDC).

President Spencer W. Kimball flatly denounced the idea as false in the October 1976 General Conference as follows:

"We hope that you who teach in the various organizations, whether on the campuses or in our chapels, will always teach the orthodox truth. We warn you against the dissemination of doctrines which are not according to the scriptures and which are alleged to have been taught by some of the General Authorities of past generations. Such, for instance, is the Adam-God theory. We denounce that theory and hope that everyone will be cautioned against this and other kinds of false doctrine." (Spencer W. Kimball, "Our Own Liahona," Ensign, November 1976, p. 77.)