Difference between revisions of "Ex-Mormon"
Gilgamesh79 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | [http://www.lightplanet.com/response/ Ex-Mormon], or Exmormon, sometimes abbreviated as Exmo, is a term used by former members of the [[Mormon Church]] to describe themselves. There is no one group that can be described as “Ex-Mormon.” Persons who leave the Mormon Church are a very heterogeneous group ranging from [http://fairlds.org/pubs/conf/2005PetD.html liberal agnostics] to the most conservative evangelical Christians and everything in between. Some simply choose to leave the Church and join another denomination, and while technically speaking these people are “ex-Mormons,” the term is generally reserved for people active in the ex-Mormon and frequently [[anti-Mormon]] world. | |
| + | |||
| + | Perhaps the most famous of these self-described ex-Mormon groups is [http://fairlds.org/apol/ai190.html Ed Decker]’s organization called variously “Recovery from Mormonism,” “Saints Alive,” or “Ex-Mormons for Jesus.” Decker was [http://www.aros.net/~wenglund/excomm.htm excommunicated] from the Mormon Church in 1976. He has become quite controversial for his sensationalist attacks against Mormonism (which were condemned by the [http://www.fairlds.org/pubs/tagm/tagm34.html Anti-Defamation League]), his hyperbolic language and unsubstantiated claims. Other ex-Mormons and critics of Mormonism have rejected his work and his style, but he remains influential particularly through the internet. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The majority of those who describe themselves as ex-Mormons and participate in the various on-line ex-Mormon blogs are [http://fairlds.org/apol/ai137.html secular humanists] who reject what they see as anti-rationalist, superstitious, and group-thinking within Mormonism. These groups portray the Mormon Church as a mind-controlling cult. These critiques, however, assume that conformity, which is actually not as pervasive within Mormonism as either Mormons or ex-Mormons believe, is necessarily the result of coercion, brain-washing, and so forth rather than the volitional assent and agreement by free-thinking individuals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mormonism holds individual agency as a primary principle of human life and believes that persons cannot be excommunicated or disfellowshipped simply because of their beliefs. Mormonism does not have a concept of heresy similar to other Christian denominations, but has instead an idea of apostasy, which refers to internal rebellion, not to doctrinal dissent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Apostasy must therefore be a volitional act. However, excluding those who are excommunicated for moral transgressions such as adultery or homosexuality, most of those who apostatize do so because they disagree intellectually with Church doctrine and practice. In Mormonism, an individual is free to think and believe as they choose, so long as they do not attempt to usurp authority or teach their beliefs in place of Church teachings. If a person disagrees with Mormon doctrine or practice, then they are in all likelihood no longer believers in Mormonism and hence should not find it troubling when the Church wishes to remove their names from its records through excommunication. | ||
| + | |||
| + | While the Mormon Church rarely chooses to fight back with its attackers, preferring instead to teach its message in a positive spirit, faithful Mormons have not remained silent in the onslaught of anti-Mormon hate literature which has grown exponentially since the 1960s. Beginning in 1979, Mormon Scholars established the [http://farms.org Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies], commonly called FARMS. This organization consists of believing Mormon scholars who defend the claims of Mormonism and respond to attacks against the Church. Since then, other organizations and websites have appeared to defend the Church including [http://fairlds.org/apol/ FAIRLDS], whose aim to disseminate Mormon apologetic literature proving that the claims of Mormonism can stand up to rigorous intellectual critique and debate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Other Mormon Apologetics Sites: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://www.shields-research.org/index.htm SHIELDS] | ||
| + | *[http://www.mormonfortress.com/ Mormon Fortress] | ||
| + | *[http://www.lightplanet.com/response/ Light Planet] | ||
| + | *[http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDS_Intro.shtml Jeff Lindsay] | ||
| + | *[http://mormanity.blogspot.com/ Mormanity] | ||
Revision as of 14:00, 27 March 2006
Ex-Mormon, or Exmormon, sometimes abbreviated as Exmo, is a term used by former members of the Mormon Church to describe themselves. There is no one group that can be described as “Ex-Mormon.” Persons who leave the Mormon Church are a very heterogeneous group ranging from liberal agnostics to the most conservative evangelical Christians and everything in between. Some simply choose to leave the Church and join another denomination, and while technically speaking these people are “ex-Mormons,” the term is generally reserved for people active in the ex-Mormon and frequently anti-Mormon world.
Perhaps the most famous of these self-described ex-Mormon groups is Ed Decker’s organization called variously “Recovery from Mormonism,” “Saints Alive,” or “Ex-Mormons for Jesus.” Decker was excommunicated from the Mormon Church in 1976. He has become quite controversial for his sensationalist attacks against Mormonism (which were condemned by the Anti-Defamation League), his hyperbolic language and unsubstantiated claims. Other ex-Mormons and critics of Mormonism have rejected his work and his style, but he remains influential particularly through the internet.
The majority of those who describe themselves as ex-Mormons and participate in the various on-line ex-Mormon blogs are secular humanists who reject what they see as anti-rationalist, superstitious, and group-thinking within Mormonism. These groups portray the Mormon Church as a mind-controlling cult. These critiques, however, assume that conformity, which is actually not as pervasive within Mormonism as either Mormons or ex-Mormons believe, is necessarily the result of coercion, brain-washing, and so forth rather than the volitional assent and agreement by free-thinking individuals.
Mormonism holds individual agency as a primary principle of human life and believes that persons cannot be excommunicated or disfellowshipped simply because of their beliefs. Mormonism does not have a concept of heresy similar to other Christian denominations, but has instead an idea of apostasy, which refers to internal rebellion, not to doctrinal dissent.
Apostasy must therefore be a volitional act. However, excluding those who are excommunicated for moral transgressions such as adultery or homosexuality, most of those who apostatize do so because they disagree intellectually with Church doctrine and practice. In Mormonism, an individual is free to think and believe as they choose, so long as they do not attempt to usurp authority or teach their beliefs in place of Church teachings. If a person disagrees with Mormon doctrine or practice, then they are in all likelihood no longer believers in Mormonism and hence should not find it troubling when the Church wishes to remove their names from its records through excommunication.
While the Mormon Church rarely chooses to fight back with its attackers, preferring instead to teach its message in a positive spirit, faithful Mormons have not remained silent in the onslaught of anti-Mormon hate literature which has grown exponentially since the 1960s. Beginning in 1979, Mormon Scholars established the Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, commonly called FARMS. This organization consists of believing Mormon scholars who defend the claims of Mormonism and respond to attacks against the Church. Since then, other organizations and websites have appeared to defend the Church including FAIRLDS, whose aim to disseminate Mormon apologetic literature proving that the claims of Mormonism can stand up to rigorous intellectual critique and debate.
Other Mormon Apologetics Sites:
