Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexuality"
From MormonWiki
Ideastoday (talk | contribs) |
(Redirect proposal.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is the intention to include in this article the Mormon viewpoint on homosexuality as well (which will be challenging of course)?--[[User:Ideastoday|Ideastoday]] 14:17, 4 November 2006 (MST) | Is the intention to include in this article the Mormon viewpoint on homosexuality as well (which will be challenging of course)?--[[User:Ideastoday|Ideastoday]] 14:17, 4 November 2006 (MST) | ||
| + | :There was much of that on the former Mormon Gays page, now moved to [[Same-sex attraction]]. --[[User:Seanmcox|Seanmcox]] 09:55, 15 November 2007 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Redirect Proposal== | ||
| + | I've noted that the content here is repeated in same-sex attraction as a discussion of terminology. Inasmuch as this article doesn't seem to enlarge on that content and [[Same-sex attraction]] seems to meet the needs of an article on homosexuality, I will probably change this page to a redirect soon. I can imagine that this term could merit a page of its own, but I do not think that it needs such a separate page in its current state. (Would need some more work.) --[[User:Seanmcox|Seanmcox]] 09:55, 15 November 2007 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:55, 15 November 2007
Is the intention to include in this article the Mormon viewpoint on homosexuality as well (which will be challenging of course)?--Ideastoday 14:17, 4 November 2006 (MST)
- There was much of that on the former Mormon Gays page, now moved to Same-sex attraction. --Seanmcox 09:55, 15 November 2007 (MST)
Redirect Proposal
I've noted that the content here is repeated in same-sex attraction as a discussion of terminology. Inasmuch as this article doesn't seem to enlarge on that content and Same-sex attraction seems to meet the needs of an article on homosexuality, I will probably change this page to a redirect soon. I can imagine that this term could merit a page of its own, but I do not think that it needs such a separate page in its current state. (Would need some more work.) --Seanmcox 09:55, 15 November 2007 (MST)
